IAS/UPSC Coaching Institute  

Article 1: Strategic Self-Reliance in Geopolitics

Why in News: Recent developments regarding the linking of India’s oil imports with trade negotiations by the United States have revived debate on the need for Atmanirbharta (strategic self-reliance) to safeguard India’s national security and foreign policy autonomy.

Key Details

  • India historically faced four major external dependencies: food, foreign exchange, defence equipment, and energy.
  • Several crises such as the 1962 war, 1965–67 food crisis, and 1991 balance of payments crisis exposed the strategic risks of dependence.
  • Increasing weaponisation of trade, finance, and energy by major powers has intensified the need for strategic self-reliance.
  • India’s foreign policy now focuses on managing great-power competition while reducing critical vulnerabilities.

Historical External Dependencies of India

  • Food Dependency: In the 1960s India depended heavily on PL-480 food aid from the United States. The droughts of 1965–67 exposed this vulnerability, pushing India to launch the Green Revolution, which later made the country largely food secure.
  • Foreign Exchange Constraints: India faced a major foreign exchange crisis in 1957–58, highlighting limitations of the early development model. The situation worsened in 1991, when foreign reserves fell to the level of two weeks of imports.
  • Defence Equipment Shortage: The 1962 India–China War exposed gaps in military preparedness and dependence on imported defence equipment. This led to efforts to strengthen domestic defence production and diversify suppliers.
  • Energy Dependence: India imports nearly 85% of its crude oil requirements, making it vulnerable to global geopolitical disruptions such as the 1990 Gulf War, which contributed to the balance-of-payments crisis.

Weaponisation of Economic Interdependence

  • Energy as Strategic Leverage: Major powers increasingly use energy supply and pricing as geopolitical tools. Linking energy trade with political conditions can constrain a country’s strategic autonomy.
  • Financial Sanctions and Global Finance: The use of financial sanctions by Western countries during the Russia–Ukraine conflict illustrates how global financial systems can be used as instruments of pressure.
  • Technology Control Regimes: Restrictions on access to advanced technologies, semiconductors, and critical minerals highlight how technological dependency can become a strategic vulnerability.
  • Trade Conditionalities: Trade agreements sometimes involve implicit political conditions, potentially affecting a country’s foreign policy independence and economic policy choices.

Concept of Atmanirbharta in Strategic Policy

  • Self-Reliance as Strategic Autonomy: Atmanirbharta does not imply economic isolation but focuses on reducing critical dependencies while engaging globally.
  • Continuity in Indian Policy: The concept of self-reliance existed since the early years of planning under Jawaharlal Nehru, emphasizing domestic industrial capacity and technological development.
  • Modern Policy Framework: The government’s Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative (2020) aims to strengthen domestic manufacturing, supply chains, and technological capabilities.
  • Sectoral Focus: Key sectors targeted for self-reliance include defence manufacturing, semiconductors, renewable energy, pharmaceuticals, and critical infrastructure.

Diaspora and Globalised Elite as Emerging Vulnerabilities

  • Diaspora as Economic Asset: India’s diaspora of over 32 million people worldwide contributes significantly through remittances, which exceeded $125 billion in 2023.
  • Impact of Immigration Policies: Restrictive immigration policies in major economies can affect India’s skilled workforce mobility and economic opportunities.
  • Influence on Domestic Narratives: Globalised elites and international networks sometimes shape policy discourse, potentially influencing domestic political debates.
  • Strategic Balance: While diaspora engagement strengthens India’s global influence, excessive dependence on external networks may create new vulnerabilities.

Managing Big-Power Rivalry

  • Multipolar Global Order: The contemporary geopolitical environment is characterised by competition among major powers, particularly the United States, China, and Russia.
  • Strategic Autonomy in Foreign Policy: India traditionally follows a policy of strategic autonomy, earlier reflected in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) during the Cold War.
  • Balancing Partnerships: India engages simultaneously with different blocs, participating in platforms such as QUAD, BRICS, and SCO, reflecting its balancing strategy.
  • Avoiding Strategic Dependence: The key objective is to prevent any single power from exploiting India’s economic or technological dependencies.

Conclusion

India’s pursuit of Atmanirbharta must focus on reducing critical external dependencies while maintaining active global engagement. Strengthening domestic manufacturing, diversifying energy sources, promoting technological innovation, and maintaining strategic autonomy in foreign policy are essential. In an era of intense great-power rivalry, the ability to manage dependencies while protecting national interests will remain central to India’s economic and strategic resilience.

EXPECTED QUESTIONS FOR UPSC CSE

Prelims MCQ

Q. Which of the following sectors historically represented major external dependencies for India?

  1. Food
  2. Energy
  3. Defence equipment
  4. Foreign exchange

Select the correct answer:
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 1, 2 and 3 only
(c) 1, 2, 3 and 4
(d) 2 and 4 only

Answer: (c)

Descriptive Question

Q. “Strategic self-reliance is essential for safeguarding India’s national security and foreign policy autonomy.” Discuss in the context of rising big-power rivalries. (150 Words, 10 Marks)