IAS/UPSC Coaching Institute  

Editorial 2 : The Road from Pahalgam

Context: Pahalgam terror attack

 

Introduction: Terrorist attack at Baisaran meadow near Pahalgam killed 25 tourists and a local. The attack breaks the unwritten compact where terrorists historically avoided targeting tourists. This threatens J&K’s tourism-dependent economy, risking widespread socio-economic hardship.

 

Historical Context of Terrorism in J&K

  • Tourist Targeting Trends
    • A total of 24 incidents targeting tourists since 2000, of which 13 were incidents of killing, resulting in 44 fatalities.
    • Exclusion of Pilgrims: Hindu pilgrims were never part of the implicit compact.
  • Violence Peaks
    • 2001: Highest fatalities (4,011).
    • 2012: Lowest fatalities (121), followed by resurgence until 2020.
    • 2024: 127 fatalities (steady decline since 2020).

 

Impact on Tourism and Economy

  • Tourism’s Role
    • Vital for livelihoods, virtually all Valley families depend on tourism directly or indirectly.
    • 2024 Data: 23.6 million tourists visited J&K before the attack.
  • Post-Attack Concerns
    • Short-term decline in tourist activities likely.
    • Long-term economic instability if attacks persist.

 

Government’s Normalcy Narrative Post-Article 370

  • Government’s Promise: Zero terrorism post-Article 370 abrogation (2019).
  • Contradictions
    • Persistent terrorism (e.g. Reasi attack on Hindu pilgrims in 2024).
    • Active terrorist strength: 76 (59 foreign, 17 local) as of March 2025.
  • Progress Metrics
    • Fatalities dropped from 4,011 (2001) to 127 (2024).
    • Security grid improvements reduced terrorist operational capacity.

 

Perpetrators and Regional Dynamics

  • Responsibility for Pahalgam Attack
    • The attack is likely orchestrated by The Resistance Front (TRF), a Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) front.
    • Pakistani state support is suspected (funding/logistics, if not direct planning).
  • Jammu recorded 59 fatalities in 2023, dispelling myths of a peaceful Jammu.
  • Terrorist groups exploit security gaps but lack strategic shift from Kashmir.

 

Policy and Response Options

  • Retaliation Strategies
    • Overt Actions (e.g. Surgical Strikes, Balakot Air Strike): Theatrical but risk escalation and uncertain strategic gains.
    • Covert Retaliation: Preferred for impactful results without public escalation risks.
  • Security Adjustments
    • Reinforce Jammu’s security grid to address dilution of forces.
    • Avoid politicizing counter-terrorism efforts.

 

Conclusion: There is no radical shift in trajectory despite Pahalgam attack and long-term decline in violence indicates progress toward normalcy. There is a need to sustain counter-terrorism gains through adaptive security measures along with addressing alienation in J&K while neutralizing external support networks.